Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o>
To: gentoo-soc@l.g.o
Cc: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-soc] Re: Progress on Universal Select Tool
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:09:02
Message-Id: 8b4c83ad0907222009sba2c36fu59d2caf68ebcfd95@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Progress on Universal Select Tool by "Sérgio Almeida"
1 2009/7/23 Sérgio Almeida <mephx.x@×××××.com>:
2 > I'm still not doing any commits as uselect can still break your python
3 > environment while testing and i don't have the time to learn how to
4 > handle branches in git.
5 >
6
7 It's probably wise to commit code in small-ish (and self-containing)
8 discrete units each of which add something without breaking anything.
9 Otherwise, it becomes very difficult to track down which change broke
10 something via git bisect. I would recommend that you try to do this,
11 if only just to learn how to make good commits.
12
13 You could take a look at how the kernel folks handle this -- features
14 go in as several small commits/patches.
15
16 --
17 ~Nirbheek Chauhan

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-soc] Re: Progress on Universal Select Tool "Sérgio Almeida" <mephx.x@×××××.com>
[gentoo-dev] Re: Progress on Universal Select Tool Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>