Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Grobian <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: tcsh vs. csh, removal of the latter
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:19:29
Message-Id: 20060128151440.GA21851@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: tcsh vs. csh, removal of the latter by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 On 28-01-2006 01:47:27 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
2 > On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 12:05:30PM +0300, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
3 > > To solve symlink problem I can suggest the following.
4 > Rather than handling it manually, perhaps eselect can help handle it
5 > consistently, and allow users to switch when they have both csh and
6 > tcsh installed.
7
8 I think this will make sense if we would rename csh to bsd-csh and then
9 let eselect handle the symlink for csh to bsd-csh or tcsh.
10
11 The question here now actually is: "is csh worth the hassle, or not?"
12 My opinion is that it is not.
13
14
15 --
16 Fabian Groffen
17 --
18 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: tcsh vs. csh, removal of the latter "Marcelo Góes" <vanquirius@g.o>