1 |
On Saturday, August 30, 2014 01:41:26 PM Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> Dnia 2014-08-30, o godz. 13:27:08 |
3 |
> |
4 |
> "J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org> napisał(a): |
5 |
> > On Friday, August 29, 2014 10:41:51 PM Rich Freeman wrote: |
6 |
> > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki <jauhien@g.o> |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > wrote: |
9 |
> > > > Hi all, |
10 |
> > > > |
11 |
> > > > I have a simple question: why do we have systemd subprofiles only in |
12 |
> > > > gnome |
13 |
> > > > and kde profiles? |
14 |
> > > > |
15 |
> > > > Could we add systemd subprofiles also to default/linux/$arch/13.0/ and |
16 |
> > > > desktop (and any other profiles where it makes sense)? |
17 |
> > > |
18 |
> > > I'm not sure systemd profiles actually make that much sense these |
19 |
> > > days. To install systemd from a stage3 you basically just need to set |
20 |
> > > USE=systemd and do an emerge -uDN world. We're actually getting close |
21 |
> > > to the point where you would pick an init system the way you pick a |
22 |
> > > kernel or cron implementation during install. |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > Not sure if this idea has been discussed before, but: |
25 |
> |
26 |
> > Wouldn't it be an idea to have a "virtual/init" which depends on 1 of: |
27 |
> You mean our virtual/service-manager? |
28 |
|
29 |
Yes, couldn't quickly find it. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Joost |