Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Tom Wesley <tom@×××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Portage bitching out loud [Re: [gentoo-dev] List of packages which 'inherit gcc']
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 21:26:25
Message-Id: 1116192264.14868.4.camel@tom.tomaw.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] List of packages which 'inherit gcc' by Mike Frysinger
1 On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 17:21 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > On Sunday 15 May 2005 05:11 pm, Michael Cummings wrote:
3 > > Would have been nice to get this email before portage started griping a day
4 > > or so ago.
5 >
6 > portage isnt griping, gcc.eclass is because i put it there
7 >
8 > besides, i didnt use caps and i said 'Please', so it's just a friendly
9 > notice !
10 > -mike
11
12 Can portage moaning about various validation that end users don't care
13 about be made a FEATURE? I hate upgrading package-x and the guy
14 standing over my shoulder seeing "Invalid blah blah".
15
16 --
17 Tom Wesley <tom@×××××.org>

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies