| 1 |
On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 12:24 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 8/2/19 11:58 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Given that overlays won't do proper assignment, the numbers they choose |
| 4 |
> > may collide with numbers used in ::gentoo. Forcing explicit assignment |
| 5 |
> > from dynamic range is cleaner in that regard. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I think it would be cleanest to leave the hacks in the overlay, and set |
| 9 |
> the desired ID to either 999 or a random number like floppym suggested. |
| 10 |
> The meaning of RANDOM is even more clear than "-1", and doesn't require |
| 11 |
> us to add both the code that's dead-on-arrival and the CI check to |
| 12 |
> ensure that it stays that way. But you're the one who's maintaining it |
| 13 |
> now so I won't argue. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I suppose setting it to 999 would also serve the purpose. Jaco, do you |
| 17 |
agree? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Best regards, |
| 21 |
Michał Górny |
Archives