| 1 |
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 14:48, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 21:09 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I'm open to arguments in favor of such a project, tho, if people have |
| 4 |
> > real plans. Certainly, an easier way to generate and maintain root |
| 5 |
> > filesystems for UML would be nice. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> As far as VMware is concerned, I see no point in this herd. All of the |
| 8 |
> VMware stuff is already managed by the VMware team, and is a part of the |
| 9 |
> vmware herd. Adding it to a broader herd won't improve VMware in any |
| 10 |
> way. The only thing it will do is ensure that the members of the VMware |
| 11 |
> team get emails about bugs in things they aren't interested in working |
| 12 |
> with, or have no knowledge of whatsoever. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
i agree, same applies for the vserver herd (currently maintaining openvz and |
| 15 |
linux-vserver) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> If such a herd does form, leave VMware out of it, please. |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives