1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 26/05/12 03:40 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
5 |
> All, |
6 |
> |
7 |
> I realize this has been discussed and there are definite opinions |
8 |
> about which method works well. So, I want to take a different |
9 |
> approach. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Is there any interest in documenting and supporting newnet along |
12 |
> side oldnet as opposed to killing newnet? |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Newnet would consist of the "network" init script to set up your |
15 |
> loopback interface along with something like dhcpcd, |
16 |
> networkmanager, or wicd (and wpa_supplicant for wireless |
17 |
> interfaces) running in standalone mode to manage your other |
18 |
> interfaces. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> My understanding of the way newnet works is that the big advantage |
21 |
> would come for workstations that have a simple network setup and |
22 |
> where users would want hotplugged interfaces to just work. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Any thoughts? |
25 |
> |
26 |
> William |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
Just want to point out that my hotplugged interfaces work great with |
31 |
oldnet. |
32 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
33 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
34 |
|
35 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAk/CPuMACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAAYgD/QUwTWo4ov++qtmsR8P5TQjQd |
36 |
EngeAjncgIU5kMcyiqQA/0M4qfS0T3xnWwEU61GPr/YuDjRbeVhjM81gPveGxm3P |
37 |
=otGU |
38 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |