1 |
Will, |
2 |
|
3 |
I appreciate the spirit of what you posted, but I want to be clear |
4 |
that I do not expect or request any special treatment, so I don't |
5 |
agree with you. |
6 |
|
7 |
We should *always* have some level of respect of gentoo-dev, |
8 |
regardless of who we're talking to. |
9 |
|
10 |
-Daniel |
11 |
|
12 |
On 3/4/07, William L. Thomson Jr. <wltjr@g.o> wrote: |
13 |
> I hope this does not generate many if any replies. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Some might seen Daniel as a deserter, sell out for leaving much less |
16 |
> going to work for M$, and so on. Granted while he was gone, many things |
17 |
> have changed. I am sure he is trying to catch up on all that. I am also |
18 |
> sure he is appreciative and thankful for all those who kept Gentoo going |
19 |
> and moving forward in his absence. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> But let us all not forget that just like with Linus, without Daniel and |
22 |
> his past efforts there would be no Gentoo. In that regard I think we all |
23 |
> owe him a level of professional respect and politeness. Which we all |
24 |
> also owe each other as well. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Granted he like us all is human, and we all make mistakes. No one of use |
27 |
> knows everything about all things, past, present, and future. I believe |
28 |
> he has good intentions with his return to the project. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> I think to a certain extend we should follow his lead, because |
31 |
> indirectly we already are. We are working on a project he started, under |
32 |
> foundations, and other things that were mostly put into place by him. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> So I we can cut him some slack, and we should all have some level of |
35 |
> respect, at least in public, towards the father, creator, and founder of |
36 |
> Gentoo. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> IMHO, from a rather new dev ~7months. So please do not set me on fire or |
39 |
> stake me. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> -- |
42 |
> William L. Thomson Jr. |
43 |
> Gentoo/Java |
44 |
> |
45 |
> |
46 |
-- |
47 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |