| 1 |
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 03:16:44 +0100 |
| 2 |
Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > > You need to learn to respect what you don't know that you |
| 6 |
> > > > > don't know. |
| 7 |
> > > > |
| 8 |
> > > > Or you apply knowledge codification and mark it as experimental. |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > No, that's what you *know* that you don't know. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Exactly, which effectively keeps us away from unknown unknowns; |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I'm afraid that's utter nonsense. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
It is as much nonsense as your example that doesn't work out for that. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> I should have known better than to try to tell you something. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Communication with all the parties, looking into history cases, looking |
| 21 |
into other cases and more was done by the QA team; if there is still an |
| 22 |
unknown unknown, it is due to the lack of knowledge codification. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
It is what brought the QA team to a slow start, as there were barely |
| 25 |
documents available besides a GLEP and a small set of documentation; |
| 26 |
this is noticeable in other areas of our distribution as well, your |
| 27 |
example demonstrates the importance of knowledge codification here. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Marking it as experimental keeps everyone happy. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
With kind regards, |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 35 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 38 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 39 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
Archives