| 1 |
On Monday 21 June 2010 09:53:02 Arun Raghavan wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 21 June 2010 11:43, Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> [...] |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> >> introspection: Add gobject-introspection support, allowing for the |
| 6 |
> >> dynamic generation of bindings for various languages |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > why not naming the useflag gobject-introspection then ? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Mostly because it seems exceedingly verbose to me (yes, I know we have |
| 11 |
> longer USE flags, and I find them too long as well). |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
well, it removes any possible ambiguity; it's meaning may be obvious for you |
| 14 |
but for me, when I see an "introspection" useflag, I wonder why that package |
| 15 |
would like to do its self psychanalysis... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
also, remember that having useflag descriptions is only an addition to accurate |
| 18 |
useflag names, not a justification for having vague names |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
A. |
Archives