1 |
On Monday 21 June 2010 09:53:02 Arun Raghavan wrote: |
2 |
> On 21 June 2010 11:43, Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> [...] |
4 |
> |
5 |
> >> introspection: Add gobject-introspection support, allowing for the |
6 |
> >> dynamic generation of bindings for various languages |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > why not naming the useflag gobject-introspection then ? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Mostly because it seems exceedingly verbose to me (yes, I know we have |
11 |
> longer USE flags, and I find them too long as well). |
12 |
|
13 |
well, it removes any possible ambiguity; it's meaning may be obvious for you |
14 |
but for me, when I see an "introspection" useflag, I wonder why that package |
15 |
would like to do its self psychanalysis... |
16 |
|
17 |
also, remember that having useflag descriptions is only an addition to accurate |
18 |
useflag names, not a justification for having vague names |
19 |
|
20 |
A. |