| 1 |
On Sun, 24 May 2020 10:33:18 +0200 |
| 2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> If it creates an invalid environment that is known to break packages |
| 5 |
> and is not QA-sanctioned, it should be masked. Period. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Seems like yet another argument in favour of my initial position, that |
| 9 |
it probably shouldn't be controlled by a USE flag, and should *only* be |
| 10 |
controlled by the tool itself via local config persistence. (Where |
| 11 |
presently, there's no config persistence, the USE flag is all there is) |
Archives