Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:30:37
Message-Id: 201106271822.30282.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] SHA256 and indention in metadata.xml by Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sunday, June 26, 2011 12:51:53 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 13:51, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > >>>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote: > >>>>> Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be > >>>>> indented? Tabs or n spaces? > >>>> > >>>> There's no rule, but we should follow the same rule as ebuilds — > >>>> indentation should be with a tab that's displayed as 4 spaces in > >>>> editors (no expansion of tabs to spaces). > >>> > >>> meh ... let devs do whatever they want > >> > >> Didn't I just say there's no rule? > > > > and if you keep reading, you'll see that you also said "devs should XXX" > > should != must.
and all i said was "devs should do whatever they want"
> I understand that you're touchy about rules after the whole ChangeLog > mess, but must we debate the nuances of the English language and > contribute to the massive amount of pre-existing bikeshed noise on > this mailing list?
i'm really not. i dont why you read more into it than is actually there. if anything, your responses seem a bit more touchy. -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature