1 |
On Sunday, June 26, 2011 12:51:53 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 13:51, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
4 |
> >> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
5 |
> >>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 10:23, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
6 |
> >>>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, justin wrote: |
7 |
> >>>>> Another question, do we have a rule, how the metadata.xml has to be |
8 |
> >>>>> indented? Tabs or n spaces? |
9 |
> >>>> |
10 |
> >>>> There's no rule, but we should follow the same rule as ebuilds — |
11 |
> >>>> indentation should be with a tab that's displayed as 4 spaces in |
12 |
> >>>> editors (no expansion of tabs to spaces). |
13 |
> >>> |
14 |
> >>> meh ... let devs do whatever they want |
15 |
> >> |
16 |
> >> Didn't I just say there's no rule? |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > and if you keep reading, you'll see that you also said "devs should XXX" |
19 |
> |
20 |
> should != must. |
21 |
|
22 |
and all i said was "devs should do whatever they want" |
23 |
|
24 |
> I understand that you're touchy about rules after the whole ChangeLog |
25 |
> mess, but must we debate the nuances of the English language and |
26 |
> contribute to the massive amount of pre-existing bikeshed noise on |
27 |
> this mailing list? |
28 |
|
29 |
i'm really not. i dont why you read more into it than is actually there. if |
30 |
anything, your responses seem a bit more touchy. |
31 |
-mike |