| 1 |
Simon Stelling wrote: |
| 2 |
> Wernfried Haas wrote: |
| 3 |
>> As far i am concerned, i find seperate sections quite good as it's a |
| 4 |
>> clear solution as it's easy to see who is an official Gentoo monkey |
| 5 |
>> who did all the quiz stuff etc. May be subject to personal taste though. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Well, yeah, it just makes we wonder what the fuck an ebuild quiz has to |
| 8 |
> do with a bash framework, as in this example? Really, the ebuild quiz is |
| 9 |
> cool for ebuild maintainers, so you at least know about some common |
| 10 |
> mistakes, but it does nothing beyond that. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Simply spoken: You can use them as indicator for _nothing_, i.e. it's |
| 13 |
> completely unimportant whether you did the quizzes or not. IMO, at least. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Moreso for me it lists people as having @gentoo e-mail addresses, which |
| 17 |
is incorrect. I think perhaps listing their e-mail in a seperate field |
| 18 |
and dropping the "nickname@g.o", such that for contributors we |
| 19 |
can list alternate addresses. |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives