| 1 |
This has come up before, and I still wish to voice against it. Like I |
| 2 |
said to Mike (vapier/spanky) in a previous post, and what msterret and I |
| 3 |
are working on fixing through the tree is: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
tcltk? ( X? ( blah ) ) |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
which is more accurate. By separating them you run into this error |
| 8 |
case: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
USE="-tcl tk" |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
except that tk needs tcl. And once upon a time they actually were |
| 13 |
separate. I put them together because every ebuild that had a tk dep in |
| 14 |
it was doing: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
tcl? ( tcl ) tk? ( tk ) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
which is just silly really. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
My 2 cents, |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Seemant Kulleen |
| 25 |
Developer and Project Co-ordinator, |
| 26 |
Gentoo Linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~seemant |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3458780E |
| 29 |
Key fingerprint = 23A9 7CB5 9BBB 4F8D 549B 6593 EDA2 65D8 3458 780E |
Archives