| 1 |
>>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2022, Thomas Bracht Laumann Jespersen wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Minor language things, on the whole an easy document to read! |
| 4 |
>> Motivation |
| 5 |
>> ========== |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> So far, old EAPIs were deprecated by the Gentoo Council in an ad-hoc |
| 8 |
>> manner. No fixed criteria were used, resulting in very different |
| 9 |
>> deprecation times after approval of newer EAPIs. Standardized |
| 10 |
>> criteria for deprecation and banning will make the life cycle of EAPIs |
| 11 |
>> more predictable. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> "very different" could maybe be specified further. Something like |
| 14 |
> "inconsistent"/"unreliable"/"unpredictable" is more precise? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> The Gentoo Council will ban a deprecated EAPI when |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> * 24 months have passed since its deprecation, and |
| 20 |
>> * it is used by less than 5 % of ebuilds in the Gentoo repository. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> Should be "fewer than 5 %". |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> A delay of 24 months between deprecation and ban will give ebuild |
| 26 |
>> authors enough time to update. This is especially relevant for |
| 27 |
>> overlays and downstream distributions. Since a banned EAPI is |
| 28 |
>> sufficient reason for updating an ebuild, an additional threshold of |
| 29 |
>> 5 % is required, in order to keep the number of such updates (and bug |
| 30 |
>> reports requesting them) manageable. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
> Two things: |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
> "Since" has a temporal meaning, but is often used to mean "although". Maybe |
| 35 |
> "although" is a better word here? |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
> I would drop the ", in order" and make it simply "[…] an additional threshold |
| 38 |
> of 5% is required to keep the number […]" |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Thanks, should be all fixed. Updated version will follow. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Ulrich |
Archives