| 1 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> Matthias Langer wrote: |
| 3 |
>> no offense, but this is one of the worst proposals i've ever read on |
| 4 |
>> this list; why? because, one of gentoo's major problems is that it is |
| 5 |
>> becoming more and more a toy exclusively for its own developers. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Gentoo's always been exclusively for the developers. Nobody's paying us |
| 8 |
> to do this. It just so happens that the things we want to do also |
| 9 |
> benefit other people, and so they use them. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
That was my thought as well. We (the developers) owe nothing to the community at |
| 12 |
large. We are volunteers, and if we want to treat Gentoo as our own personal toy |
| 13 |
(which we currently aren't), then so be it. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ |
| 17 |
Gentoo Linux Developer Catalyst/Installer + x86 release coordinator |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives