Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions to arches/stable problem
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 04:30:22
Message-Id: 20040624041656.GE18367@mustard.flatmonk.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] summary: proposed solutions to arches/stable problem by foser
1 foser wrote: [Wed Jun 23 2004, 02:45:28PM EDT]
2 > 'maintainer arch' + stable state of the ebuild on the 'maintainers arch'
3 > is the indication of stability, adding an extra line for that is
4 > duplication. The question here is about how to indicate the maintainers
5 > arch.
6
7 You're right that there would be duplication in most cases. But these
8 guys have a good point--tying stability of a package from the PM's
9 perspective to the arch on which they run isn't necessarily a box we
10 want to put ourselves in.
11
12 Regards,
13 Aron
14
15 --
16 Aron Griffis
17 Gentoo Linux Developer