Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: tomjbe@g.o
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-wireless/yatebts, net-wireless/srslte, net-wireless/nanovna-saver, net-wireless/gr-scan
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:37:06
Message-Id: 20220322093652.c3fxavjf46yvrszr@ham
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-wireless/yatebts, net-wireless/srslte, net-wireless/nanovna-saver, net-wireless/gr-scan by "Jakov Smolić"
1 On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 02:50:36PM +0100, Jakov Smolić wrote:
2 >
3 >
4 > On 3/21/22 2:38 PM, tomjbe@g.o wrote:
5 > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 06:48:55PM +0100, David Seifert wrote:
6 > >> On Sun, 2022-03-20 at 18:44 +0100, tomjbe@g.o wrote:
7 > >>> I would like to keep net-wireless/nanovna-saver. I pushed version
8 > >>> 0.3.10 to
9 > >>> the tree which should fix the problems.
10 > >>>
11 > >>> Shall I drop it from package mask or do you want to do it yourself
12 > >>> Jakov.
13 > >>>
14 > >>> - Thomas
15 > >>>
16 > >>>
17 > >>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:08:05PM +0100, Jakov Smolić wrote:
18 > >>>> # Jakov Smolić <jsmolic@g.o> (2022-03-16)
19 > >>>> # Unmaintaned, broken packages with no revdeps.
20 > >>>> # Bugs 822234, 809539, 809536, 832618, 731720, 713684,
21 > >>>> # 733662, 741082, and many others.
22 > >>>> # Removal on 2022-04-16.
23 > >>>> net-wireless/yatebts
24 > >>>> net-wireless/srslte
25 > >>>> net-wireless/nanovna-saver
26 > >>>> net-wireless/gr-scan
27 > >>>> --
28 > >>>> Jakov
29 > >>>
30 > >>
31 > >> Your new ebuild still doesn't support python 3.10, without which it
32 > >> would be lagging again.
33 > >>
34 > >
35 > > See the following commit:
36 > >
37 > > commit 725073832253187b4183b0ddaa1672451e66ae49 (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD)
38 > > Date: Mon Mar 21 14:31:09 2022 +0100
39 > > net-wireless/nanovna-saver: enable py3.10, add USE deps and tests
40 > >
41 > > Besides the deprecation warning for setuptools in Py3.12 it Works with Py3.10 like a charme.
42 >
43 > 9999 version still suffers from the same issues mentioned previously,
44 > could you update it or alternatively remove it (along with the old version)?
45 > Feel free to unmask it after it's fixed.
46 > Also, given that the package was de-facto unmaintained, I'd suggest that
47 > you add yourself to metadata.xml if you're interested in it to prevent
48 > something like this happening in the future.
49 >
50 >
51 > --
52 > Jakov
53 >
54
55 Done. Thanks for help.
56
57 --
58 Thomas

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature