Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: "M.B." <tomboy64@××××.cn>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 11:09:57
Message-Id: 20160207120929.0695b8b6.mgorny@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy by "M.B."
1 On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 11:38:27 +0100
2 "M.B." <tomboy64@××××.cn> wrote:
3
4 > Hello folks.
5 >
6 > While hacking away on a new ebuild I came across the issue that
7 > games.eclass apparently got banned from future use. The only references
8 > I was able to dig up (apart from helpful people on IRC), were
9 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566498 (games.eclass: use of
10 > games group needs to be removed wrt 20151011 Council meeting)
11 > and
12 > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Meeting_Summaries#Games_team_policies_issue
13 > (A mere deprecation notice).
14 >
15 > In contrast, a simple "grep deprec /usr/portage/eclass/" gives numerous
16 > deprecation warnings; just games.eclass is not among them.
17 >
18 > Please provide some guidance how (community-)developers are supposed to
19 > handle games (in particular wrt games.eclass) in the future. This also
20 > includes usage of /usr/games/{bin/lib/share} etc.
21
22 For reference, this is the reference decision:
23
24 https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20151213-summary.txt
25
26 I'm going to open a bug asking games team how they're going to proceed.
27
28 --
29 Best regards,
30 Michał Górny
31 <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] games.eclass policy Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o>