1 |
130201 Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> The actual reason for removal is the following: |
4 |
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425298 |
5 |
> I'm perfectly fine with masking/removing packages |
6 |
> that do not have valid SRC_URIs |
7 |
> and if somebody wants to host the tarball somewhere |
8 |
> and submit a patch to fix it we shouldn't have a problem |
9 |
> with a dev committing that patch and prolonging the package a bit longer. |
10 |
> Bottom line is that we shouldn't drop packages |
11 |
> simply because they're unmaintained or lack an upstream. |
12 |
|
13 |
+1 |
14 |
|
15 |
> Missing SRC_URIs on unmaintained packages are fair game, however, |
16 |
> as are other serious issues. I have no desire |
17 |
> to make the mirror maintainers sort thro log noise on something like this. |
18 |
|
19 |
If a mere user may comment (smile), |
20 |
I use >= 1 pkg which hasn't been updated for a long time, Apwal, |
21 |
but is in fact an excellent little app which deserves wider knowledge. |
22 |
It's one of those apps which needs no further development. |
23 |
|
24 |
There are also pkgs like Nethack, which is hard-masked |
25 |
because there's a serious security bug on multi-user systems, |
26 |
but which offers no problems on a single-user desktop. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
========================,,============================================ |
30 |
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb |
31 |
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto |
32 |
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca |