1 |
2013/1/19 William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:07:42AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
4 |
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
5 |
> > Hash: SHA256 |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > On 18/01/13 09:54 AM, William Hubbs wrote: |
8 |
> > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:33:13AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
9 |
> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 |
10 |
> > >> |
11 |
> > >> On 18/01/13 07:24 AM, vivo75@×××××.com wrote: |
12 |
> > >>> Since for servers predictable names are useful and for desktop |
13 |
> > >>> (which usually have only one ethernet that never change) Is it |
14 |
> > >>> possible to set desktop profiles to still use ethX, and base |
15 |
> > >>> profile to use new naming scheme? |
16 |
> > >>> |
17 |
> > >>> For wireless situation may be different, many of them are |
18 |
> > >>> external, could wireless be managed differently? |
19 |
> > >>> |
20 |
> > >> |
21 |
> > >> In short, no. At least, not unless the functionality that is |
22 |
> > >> currently a configure-time thing is changed into a |
23 |
> > >> build-time/install-time thing controlled via a use flag. |
24 |
> > > |
25 |
> > > Actually,this is how I set you up by dropping the file in |
26 |
> > > /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-name-slot.rules. |
27 |
> > > |
28 |
> > > Nothing changes on your system unless you remove this file and do |
29 |
> > > not have 70-persistent-net.rules. |
30 |
> > > |
31 |
> > > William |
32 |
> > > |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> > ..right, but default behaviour can't be changed automatically |
35 |
> > depending on what profile you're on, as vivo requested, since profiles |
36 |
> > don't control configuration (just use flags) |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Right, and we have a policy against using use flags to control the |
39 |
> installation of configuration files. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> vivo, what is your concern here exactly? |
42 |
> |
43 |
> William |
44 |
> |
45 |
> My concern was to make simple desktop users happy while leaving the |
46 |
servers safe. |
47 |
The answers given in the previous emails are satisfying, since they cover |
48 |
exhaustively what is in place and what could be (or not) done. |
49 |
|
50 |
Thanks, |
51 |
Francesco |