1 |
Okay, solar asked me yesterday, and I think this might be the good moment to |
2 |
start this out. |
3 |
Right now the x86-fbsd keyword is not being used in the main tree, and the |
4 |
whole Gentoo/FreeBSD is handled in an overlay, sharing the ~x86 keyword with |
5 |
standard Gentoo/Linux. |
6 |
Unfortunately this has a series of drawbacks: |
7 |
|
8 |
- we need to package.mask packages that could just not have ~x86-fbsd keyword |
9 |
at all (because being linux specifics); |
10 |
- we can see the last working version of a package go away because later |
11 |
versions are ~x86 and they don't work for us (old flex might have been an |
12 |
example but that's now fixed; findutils can be another example); |
13 |
- we cannot make sure that the deptree is satisfied. |
14 |
|
15 |
To bring ~x86-fbsd keywording in main tree, we mainly need to move a true |
16 |
profile in the tree, not a dummy one, mark it as indev and start the |
17 |
keywording. (I've already cleaned up the default-bsd/fbsd profile so that it |
18 |
does work with the current base/ profile. |
19 |
As long as virtual/libc is not in the dependencies, it shouldn't trigger any |
20 |
kind of problems to leave the sys-freebsd category in the overlay, if we |
21 |
really need to start needing that, I'll see to make the ebuild quality level. |
22 |
|
23 |
It's not going to be a quick thing, as I'm mostly alone with Gentoo/FreeBSD |
24 |
right now (help is always welcome), but times are mature so that I can |
25 |
provide a decent experience to users. |
26 |
|
27 |
Can anybody name a showstopper to this? |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ |
31 |
Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE |