| 1 |
2016-08-19 10:07 GMT+08:00 <cbergstrom@×××××××××.com>: |
| 2 |
> That seems a lot like what we've already done. I guess a GSOC student is working on the libcxxabi piece. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I am that GSoC student :) |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I'm currently trying to push libc++abi to replace libcxxrt as the |
| 7 |
default runtime: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/2048 |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
The reason is I think libc++abi blends in more naturally with other |
| 10 |
LLVM components, and it has a clear version number as opposed to |
| 11 |
libcxxrt. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> The only advantage to using our runtime, libcxxrt, is performance and code size. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Honestly I don't know what essential difference these two libs have; I |
| 16 |
can't find any decent comparison of them on the internet. Do you have |
| 17 |
some real numbers to show the difference in performance and code size? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Lei |
Archives