| 1 |
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 01:13:37PM -0400, Nathan L. Adams wrote: |
| 2 |
> Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Reviewing an ebuild has nothing to do with inclusion. For inclusion in |
| 4 |
> > the tree, it also needs to be tested. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> You don't take the slightest look at an ebuild (the code) before |
| 7 |
> including it? Anyhow, whether its testing or code review, it is time |
| 8 |
> better spent than cooking up conspiracy theories about me vs. the games |
| 9 |
> team and posting it to the mailing list. |
| 10 |
Bleh, word play/<this> isn't needed, as spanky said it's a waste. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Inclussion == commit to the tree, available via rsync. Review, and |
| 13 |
testing are both required. |
| 14 |
~harring |
Archives