1 |
On 31/05/14 22:41, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:10:40PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
3 |
>> I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings, |
4 |
>> ... to genkernel repository for: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828 |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> I'll p.mask it on amd64 profiles if noone replies soon :( |
9 |
> My excuse is AFK baby, literally sleeping on me right now, and not even |
10 |
> 2 months old. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I saw floppym's original comment opening the bug, but none of the |
13 |
> followups due to baby eating my life. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I'll apply this patch later today if I have a chance, but I do agree |
16 |
> with the general sentiment of this thread that the kernel configs NEED |
17 |
> to get out of genkernel; so that arches can touch them at will, and |
18 |
> other initramfs/kernel build tools can start to use them. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> In the absence of any other prompt complaints, I'll create a |
21 |
> kernel-configs repo, and move the configs there. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> The one thing that WILL have to be maintained in genkernel still, and |
24 |
> in-sync with kernel changes, are the modules_load files, esp when new |
25 |
> common stuff is added to the kernel (disk controllers & filesystems most |
26 |
> commonly). |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
The patch in the bug is not enough. Notice |
30 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828#c13 |
31 |
Those should be reseted to "" too. |
32 |
|
33 |
Thanks, |
34 |
Samuli |