| 1 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> Christopher O'Neill wrote: |
| 3 |
>> . I notice certain other popular distros are now running GCC4 (and |
| 4 |
>> have been for some time), yet we are still running 3.4.6 (on ~x86). I |
| 5 |
>> know it's a lot of work ensuring that all packages compile properly |
| 6 |
>> with GCC4 and that there are no introduced bugs, but I have no idea |
| 7 |
>> how we are progressing on this - and wouldn't even like to ask for |
| 8 |
>> fear of asking in the wrong place.. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Toolchain updates in particular take longer than with most distros, |
| 11 |
> because of the nature of ours -- we need every user to be able to |
| 12 |
> compile every keyworded package from source, and we have an extremely |
| 13 |
> large package database. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I bet there's a bug open for it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117482 |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
>> . How's portage 2.1 getting along? I notice it gets frequent updates. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> The gentoo-portage-dev list is the place to follow this. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Also, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115839 |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
jakub |
Archives