| 1 |
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 01:36:46PM -0500, Mark Loeser wrote: |
| 2 |
> A lot of ebuilds probably fall under this category, and we should figure |
| 3 |
> out how we want to handle all of them. I say mask the GNUStep stuff for a |
| 4 |
> month or two, put something on staffing-needs saying we need someone to |
| 5 |
> maintain them, and see what happens. You can put me down as the contact on |
| 6 |
> the staffing-needs page if you want. I hate to see things that are useful |
| 7 |
> to our users taken from the tree, but there isn't much we can do when |
| 8 |
> there is no one to maintain them. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Those ebuilds are _not_ useful to our users in their current state as |
| 11 |
they do not work. If you would hate to see them go, could you please |
| 12 |
update them to work with the new upstream version control system? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Regards, |
| 15 |
Brix |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@g.o> |
| 18 |
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd |
Archives