| 1 |
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:54:13 +0100 Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
| *Please*, be so kind and look at metadata.xml for those ebuild, then |
| 3 |
| just either do it *yourself* or ask someone from your fellow-devs in |
| 4 |
| commonbox herd to do it for the other ebuilds that you failed to |
| 5 |
| mention above... Don't move broken stuff on other people's shoulders, |
| 6 |
| as you've already done once. |
| 7 |
| |
| 8 |
| I fail to see why are you claiming here that there's even more broken |
| 9 |
| stuff in the tree, yet as a member of maintainer herd haven't dealt |
| 10 |
| with that properly for quite an extensive period of time - and then |
| 11 |
| you are asking *other* people to do something "properly". |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Did you read herds.xml yet? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Allow me to explain the root of the problem. You're so obsessed with |
| 16 |
getting that one bug closed that you're not addressing the actual |
| 17 |
issue, which is that the original bb* demo code was hideously wrong in |
| 18 |
several places and thus there are a whole load of broken packages in |
| 19 |
the tree. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Closing this one bug off will not, in the grand scheme of things, fix |
| 22 |
anything. All it will do is give you a false sense of achievement and |
| 23 |
make me or someone else file yet another "bb* is broken" bug. If you're |
| 24 |
really looking to help here, solve the problem properly. There is more |
| 25 |
to it than getting one bug closed. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat) |
| 29 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 30 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives