Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: World file handling changes in Portage-2.2
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 10:33:41
Message-Id: pan.2008.08.17.10.33.09@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: World file handling changes in Portage-2.2 by William Hubbs
1 William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> posted 20080817014611.GA6309@linux1,
2 excerpted below, on Sat, 16 Aug 2008 20:46:11 -0500:
3
4 > On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:39:41PM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
5 >> Title: World file handling changes in Portage-2.2
6 >> Author: Petteri R??ty <betelgeuse@g.o>
7 >> Author: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
8 >> Content-Type: text/plain
9 >> Posted: 2008-XX-XX
10 >> Revision: 1
11 >> News-Item-Format: 1.0
12 >> Display-If-Installed: >sys-apps/portage-2.2_rc8
13 >>
14 >> As of Portage 2.2 the world set does not include the system set any
15 >> more. If you want emerge --update --deep @world to update the system
16 >> set too, you need to add @system to the new world_sets file in
17 >> /var/lib/portage/. For more information on world_sets see man portage.
18 >
19 > This brings up a question.
20
21 I've a question as well, but a different one.
22
23 Running portage-2.2_rc8 (the latest as of this morning's update), every
24 time I try to emerge -NuD system, it tries to add @system to /var/lib/
25 portage/world_sets (saying recording it in world favorites file, but it
26 goes in world_sets not in world), regardless of the fact that I don't
27 WANT system included in world and in spite of all the einfos and posts
28 here and etc to the contrary.
29
30 I like world NOT including system, but it seems at present, portage is
31 trying to FORCE it to include it anyway, despite the einfo and all the
32 messages I've read here to the contrary. I was /wondering/ why despite
33 all the messages to the contrary, it seemed world still included system.
34 After reading this thread, I took another look at the above fine and
35 decided I must have put it there when I first upgraded, and forgotten
36 about it. So I removed it. Next thing I know, it's back! Then I look
37 and sure enough, portage keeps putting it back every time I remove it!
38 That's not nice!
39
40 Current workaround: Since I don't have anything else I need to list in
41 world_sets I simply symlinked it to /dev/null, so portage writes @system
42 into /dev/null and system and world continue to be separate as they're
43 supposed to be! Now it can write @system into world_sets all day, and it
44 won't change anything.
45
46 --
47 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
48 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
49 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: News item: World file handling changes in Portage-2.2 Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
[gentoo-dev] Re: News item: World file handling changes in Portage-2.2 Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>