Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Toby Dickenson <tdickenson@××××××××××××××××××××××××××××.uk>
To: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [caleb@gentoo.org: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo and the FHS]
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 16:17:49
Message-Id: 200311121616.42904.tdickenson@devmail.geminidataloggers.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [caleb@gentoo.org: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo and the FHS] by Paul de Vrieze
1 On Wednesday 12 November 2003 14:18, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
2
3 > > With that in mind, why is there a /var? use /tmp ;-)
4 >
5 > Because /tmp is for shortlived temporary files. /var is for files that
6 > can be regenerated, but that regeneration is allowed to be expensive.
7
8 That description applies to /var/cache. but not all of /var.
9 http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.2/fhs-5.5.html
10
11 /var isnt only for things that can be regenerated. The content of /var/mail in
12 particular is irreplaceable.
13 http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.2/fhs-5.1.html
14
15 > tmp must not contain such caches. On /tmp one is able to run a tmp
16 > reaper, on /var it would be less than desirable.
17
18 Agreed
19
20 --
21 Toby Dickenson
22
23
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [caleb@gentoo.org: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo and the FHS] splite-gentoo@××××××××××××××××.edu