Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?)
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 01:21:27
Message-Id: 20051128011854.GA23278@ols-dell.iic.hokudai.ac.jp
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?) by "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò"
1 maillog: 27/11/2005-13:54:33(+0100): Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò types
2 > On Sunday 27 November 2005 00:10, Luca Barbato wrote:
3 > > It's great!
4 > > Make it a FEATURE default on for common profiles.
5 > +1, and it would be better if the FEATURES, instead of removing the generated
6 > files, would disable the building of them completely, mainly because "work"
7 > systems with limited CPU, RAM and HDD space would probably prefer not having
8 > to create and store them :)
9
10 Wouldn't that break binary packages? I.e., if a binary package is built
11 on a system with FEATURES=-splitdebug and then merged on a system with
12 FEATURES=splitdebug the debug info would be missing.
13
14 --
15 \ Georgi Georgiev \ "What a wonder is USENET; such wholesale \
16 / chutz@×××.net / production of conjecture from such a /
17 \ http://www.gg3.net/ \ trifling investment in fact." ale-- Carl \
18 / ------------------- / S. Gutekunst /

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?) Edward Catmur <ed@×××××××××.uk>