| 1 |
El sáb, 11-04-2015 a las 21:50 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió: |
| 2 |
> Hi all, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> the debate about arches, keywording and stabilization procedures is |
| 5 |
> coming up again. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> People have told me that the whole debate seems to turn into some sort |
| 8 |
> of arch-team bashing. That is definitely not the plan. Also, |
| 9 |
> supporting many different types of hardware is actually one of the |
| 10 |
> strong points of Gentoo. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> So, it would be absolutely great to have more feedback from the arch |
| 13 |
> teams, especially suggestions |
| 14 |
> * how to improve procedures, |
| 15 |
> * where you see the main problems, and |
| 16 |
> * where you don't see problems... |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Please make your voice heard. Noone wants to overrule an active team. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Cheers, |
| 21 |
> Andreas |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> PS. I've ommitted amd64, hppa, and arm from the manual CC list because |
| 24 |
> these are the stable arches I'm definitely not worried about. |
| 25 |
> Obviously feedback is appreciated anyway. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I think we need a common place to share all the scripts we are needing |
| 29 |
to use to: |
| 30 |
- Stabilize a bunch of packages from different bug reports |
| 31 |
- Stabilize big lists from *one* bug report |
| 32 |
- All the bug handling (unCC arches when needed, close the bug when it's |
| 33 |
the last arch) |
| 34 |
- The scripts running "repoman full" on the stable candidates to report |
| 35 |
if they are not ok due to missing deps. |
| 36 |
- ... |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
And, ideally, that multiple script should be unified if possible once we |
| 39 |
can see them all in that repo and take the best from them :) |
Archives