| 1 |
On Thursday 11 April 2013 11:43:59 James Cloos wrote: |
| 2 |
> >>>>> "MF" == Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> writes: |
| 3 |
> MF> this should impact very few (if any) |
| 4 |
> MF> users, so i don't think a news item makes sense. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> It will impact everyone who has /dev/pts in fstab(5). |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
don't do that. delete the line. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> I doubt that any say gid=5. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I don't remember why this box has it in fstab; it looks like it always did. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> The backup of my (now dead) laptop also has such an entry. The rcs log |
| 15 |
> for that one shows that it got added in late '03, and not manually. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
baselayout has not included devpts in /etc/fstab since 26 Nov 2001 and even |
| 18 |
then, it was commented out |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
http://sources.gentoo.org/baselayout/branches/baselayout-1_12/etc/fstab?view=log |
| 21 |
http://sources.gentoo.org/baselayout/branches/rc- |
| 22 |
scripts-1_6/etc/fstab?view=log |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
the oldest tag we have is baselayout-1.11.15 (released 22 Apr 2006), and it |
| 25 |
doesn't include it. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
the oldest tarball i have is baselayout-1.11.8 (released 15 Dec 2004) as |
| 28 |
that's when i took over releasing things, and it doesn't include it either. |
| 29 |
it hasn't been added since that release. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
so i stand by my statement that very few people will be impacted by this. |
| 32 |
-mike |
Archives