| 1 |
Dne 15. 04. 21 v 17:56 Joakim Tjernlund napsal(a): |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 17:21 +0200, Miroslav Šulc wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Dne 15. 04. 21 v 16:34 Joakim Tjernlund napsal(a): |
| 4 |
>>> On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 09:45 +0200, Miroslav Šulc wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> in case the package does not work with java > 1.8 (still, i suggest we |
| 6 |
>>>> first try to resolve the issue before we use this restriction as it |
| 7 |
>>>> might cause some issues in the future) |
| 8 |
>>>> virtual/jdk:1.8 |
| 9 |
>>>> virtual/jre:1.8 |
| 10 |
>>> This does not seem to be enforced by java eclasses. Example dev-java/icedtea-web has |
| 11 |
>>> BDEPEND=virtual/jdk:1.8 but building icedtea-web with openjdk:11 as system default will |
| 12 |
>>> try to build with java-11 and the build will fail. |
| 13 |
>> not sure about BDEPEND but it should be enforced for DEPEND and RDEPEND. |
| 14 |
>> regular java apps use classes from jre (java runtime engine) and so they |
| 15 |
>> must have the dep both in DEPEND and RDEPEND, not BDEPEND. wrt this |
| 16 |
>> icedtea-web issue, this should be filed as a bug. thank you for |
| 17 |
>> mentioning this. |
| 18 |
> Don't think it is so simple, even if I add virtual/jdk:1.8 to DEPEND and changed |
| 19 |
> RDEPEND to virtual/jdk:1.8 it still fails. |
| 20 |
yes, looking at that icedtea-web ebuild, it inherits none of java |
| 21 |
eclasses so it can't behave as a package that inherits a java eclass. |
| 22 |
gyakovlev would definitely know better. generally, this thread is meant |
| 23 |
for packages that inherit one of java eclasses, and even that is |
| 24 |
oversimplified. |
| 25 |
>>> Jocke |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
fordfrog |
Archives