Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping static libs support from cryptsetup and lvm2
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 20:17:02
Message-Id: 520159BF.6060207@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping static libs support from cryptsetup and lvm2 by Samuli Suominen
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 30/07/13 04:42 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
5 >
6 > cryptsetup upstream installed minimal Gentoo setup and tested our
7 > handling of 'static' and was disappointed finding them broken
8 >
9 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438998 - RESO/TEST -
10 > cryptsetup static+pcre fails (fixed via resolution of bug 439414)
11 >
12 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=468400 - RESO/TEST -
13 > cryptsetup static+selinux fails (fixed via resolution of bug
14 > 439414)
15 >
16 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472692 - RESO/FIXED -
17 > cryptsetup static+ssl fails (note, only cryptsetup-1.6.1 fixed, so
18 > this should get pushed stable)
19 >
20 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462908 - RESO/FIXED - lvm2
21 > static-libs missing library
22 >
23 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467204 - lvm2 static USE
24 > flag missing proper description, yes this is minor
25 >
26 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370217 - RESO/FIXED - lvm2
27 > fails to build due to missing -lrt, likely related to linking
28 > against libudev, yes the feature we are discussing to be dropped
29 > has been completely broken for ages
30 >
31 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439414 - RESO/FIXED - lvm2
32 > static+selinux fails
33 >
34
35 So dropping IUSE="static" becomes a no-op now, right?
36
37 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
38 Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
39
40 iF4EAREIAAYFAlIBWb8ACgkQ2ugaI38ACPC44gD8CMJO4AdXLL1SWXPxhd4UBBsL
41 IJ4pl3zYgCCKrqS0jrcA/0geqa/gf0KTotkE0BqEeHm39pfr7VeEahKArSe8G9zE
42 =bpUn
43 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies