Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Peter Ruskin <aoyu93@×××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] desktop
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 19:14:41
Message-Id: 200308282014.34767.aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] desktop by Spider
1 On Thursday 28 Aug 2003 18:44, Spider wrote:
2 > 6) intra-DE modifications
3 > I'm all for the various DE's implementing or removing features, as
4 > long as its maintainable, and sane. Adding highstrung pipedreams
5 > that can't be made to work properly is not our thing. Leave this to
6 > Mandrake, SuSE and RedHat. They are good at it.
7
8 I agree wholeheartedly with everything you said in this mail, Spider;
9 especially point 6. BTW, dams used to work at Mandrake - it shows.
10
11 Peter
12 --
13 ======================================================================
14 Gentoo: Portage 2.0.48-r5 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.2.3, glibc-2.3.2-r1)
15 kernel-2.4.22_pre2-gss i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+
16 ======================================================================
17
18
19 --
20 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] desktop foser <foser@×××××××××××××××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-dev] desktop dams@×××.fr