| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 17:04 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 6 |
>> Instead, why not look into reducing the amount of traffic on -core? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Actually, the amount of traffic on -core these days has been pretty |
| 9 |
> minimal. In some weeks, the only messages setn are my GWN proofreading |
| 10 |
> requests... |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Is there some reason these need to be posted on -core? If -core is only |
| 13 |
for sensitive matters that shouldn't be made public then why post stuff |
| 14 |
there that is going to be put on the gentoo front page? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
There are a lot of people involved gentoo who aren't devs that still |
| 17 |
have a vested interest in what is going on and who help out in various |
| 18 |
ways. Obviously not everybody needs to know everything, but ideally if |
| 19 |
something isn't otherwise fairly sensitive it probably should be out in |
| 20 |
the open. Actually, I'm not really sure what kinds of things are |
| 21 |
insensitive enough to be broadcasted to hundreds of devs, but too |
| 22 |
sensitive to broadcast to thousands of users. Maybe in cases where a |
| 23 |
security bug is going to have some wide-spread effect on the entire |
| 24 |
distro that needs to be coordinated or something like that. If it some |
| 25 |
kind of personal issue it probably shouldn't even go on -core... |
| 26 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) |
| 28 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
iD8DBQFGIh0xG4/rWKZmVWkRAqYKAKCEo3IiBsZni3gdUE7faBBofzCKcwCgqTtG |
| 31 |
lG0FRyRXJG8pwkLYTBM5tmA= |
| 32 |
=hggA |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives