1 |
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:03 AM, JD Horelick <jdhore1@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> My only issue here is that I feel like we should give users a bit longer |
3 |
> than one month (34 days, close enough) to make this change. In some cases, |
4 |
> it may require a large, architectural change which may take a while to be |
5 |
> engineered and organized. I'd suggest making the cutoff for this January 1, |
6 |
> 2014. I know that impedes our progress, but I feel it provides significant |
7 |
> benefit to our users who may use seperate /usr. |
8 |
|
9 |
30 days was approved by the Council after some discussion. The fact |
10 |
that this was coming was announced about 45 days ago now, though it |
11 |
did not include a news item. This really isn't much different than |
12 |
any other change that has a potential to break systems, and we do not |
13 |
routinely give many months of warning for these. |
14 |
|
15 |
Rich |