Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP system worthwhile?
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:32:24
Message-Id: 20050311173408.7257fa58@sven.genone.homeip.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] GLEP system worthwhile? by Grant Goodyear
1 On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:39:51 -0600
2 Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Thoughts / comments? I promise not to bite anyone's head off this
5 > time!
6
7 Suggestion: make a short (one word) descriptive name mandatory. Numbers
8 get easily confused and most of the more recent GLEPs already come with
9 a nickname. For example I wouldn't know offhand which GLEP would deal
10 with ACCEPT_LICENSE stuff, and I'm also not sure about the real title
11 (maybe it doesn't contain ACCEPT_LICENSE at all), so if I want to make a
12 reference to it I actually have to look it up so people know what I'm
13 talking about. Minor issue, but really annoying over time.
14
15 Marius
16
17 --
18 Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub
19
20 In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
21 Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP system worthwhile? Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>