Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:35:03
Message-Id: 4326FED4.8030104@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting, Thursday 15th, 1900 UTC by Jon Portnoy
1 Jon Portnoy wrote:
2 > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 07:33:59AM -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
3 >
4 >>The actual powers/role of devrel has always been a grey area.
5 >
6 >
7 > No it hasn't, unless by 'gray area' you mean 'a few people who don't
8 > like devrel claim it shouldn't be able to do anything because drobbins
9 > set it up'
10 >
11 > Recruitment, conflict resolution, disciplinary issues. I.e., 'managing
12 > developers.'
13
14 Right, thats what I'm saying. If the council says its approved and thats
15 what they do, they can't complain/bitch about it because drobbins set it
16 up unless they want the council to charge them to change it.
17
18 --
19 Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o>
20 Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
21
22 ---
23 GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
24 Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742
25
26 ramereth/irc.freenode.net

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature