Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: implementation details for GLEP 41
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 15:01:50
Message-Id: 20051120145749.0027af0d@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: implementation details for GLEP 41 by Lares Moreau
1 On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 07:49:11 -0700 Lares Moreau
2 <lares.moreau@×××××.com> wrote:
3 | On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 04:29 -0700, Duncan wrote:
4 | > If the capacity is there, go RAID6 (dual parity RAID5, so two
5 | > drives can drop out without the thing dieing) with a hot-spare as
6 | > well, so threex146GB usable.
7 |
8 | Is RAID6 production ready?
9
10 RAID6 was only invented because a certain large hardware manufacturer
11 shipped a bunch of duff disks in one of its drive arrays. In practice
12 it's not necessary, because if you're taking the kind of damage that
13 kills multiple drives over a short period then you're going to lose
14 more than two drives anyway.
15
16 --
17 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!)
18 Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
19 Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: implementation details for GLEP 41 Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>