From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Cc: | Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@×××××.com> | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [Survey || RFC] autotools-utils.eclass | ||
Date: | Wed, 26 May 2010 17:28:12 | ||
Message-Id: | 201005261327.44442.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [Survey || RFC] autotools-utils.eclass by Maciej Mrozowski |
1 | On Wednesday 26 May 2010 05:38:00 Maciej Mrozowski wrote: |
2 | > I've updated documentation, added example usage and option to keep libtool |
3 | > files (ltdl.so supposedly needs those as I was told, no idea what for). |
4 | |
5 | more applicable to us w/Linux is that static linking with libtool needs them. |
6 | the AUTOTOOLS_KEEP_LA_FILES seems kind of spurious considering current tree |
7 | behavior and assumption of gnu-capable linking systems. |
8 | -mike |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [Survey || RFC] autotools-utils.eclass | Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@×××××.com> |