| 1 |
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 01:49:05PM -0500, Jon Portnoy wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:41:50PM +0100, Olivier Cr?te wrote: |
| 3 |
> > We could approach this problem from another perspective. Just have -arch |
| 4 |
> > flags (and +arch flags) for packages which are truly arch specific.. And |
| 5 |
> > for the rest, a package could not be marked stable unless it has been |
| 6 |
> > tested on all arches. Maybe using a set of tinderboxes.. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Am I reading this right -- you want to create a bottleneck where an |
| 9 |
> application can't be marked stable on an arch that may need it to be |
| 10 |
> stable unless it's also ready to be marked stable on all of the 10 |
| 11 |
> architectures we have? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Great idea! Let's ask the Debian folks (still) waiting for Sarge how well |
| 14 |
that works. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives