1 |
Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): |
2 |
> Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> Oh, so resolving 'INVALID' a bug for people that report crap like 'oh, |
4 |
>> my sci-mathematics/*' thingy got horribly broken with -ffast-math' |
5 |
>> causes an offense to them? Well, that's a good thing, maybe they'll |
6 |
>> actually use their brain next time. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> So you feel that idiocy should be punished? |
9 |
> |
10 |
|
11 |
It's already been punished as they've got their broken app; I just don't |
12 |
see why I should be forced to spend even more time on this. So, what's |
13 |
your question? If you ask whether INVALID is a valid resolution for |
14 |
bugs, then yeah, it absolutely is, and no, I don't see any need to |
15 |
change this. |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Best regards, |
20 |
|
21 |
Jakub Moc |
22 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
23 |
GPG signature: |
24 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
25 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
26 |
|
27 |
... still no signature ;) |