Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: gentoo-user@l.g.o, gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: CRITICAL: AMD64 Portage-2.0.51 Sandbox Problem
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:47:55
Message-Id: pan.2004.10.21.21.47.16.128138@cox.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] CRITICAL: AMD64 Portage-2.0.51 Sandbox Problem by Nicholas Jones
1 Nicholas Jones posted <20041021200820.GA16080@××××××.net>, excerpted
2 below, on Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:08:20 -0400:
3
4 > Please do not post in response to this email.
5 >
6 [ Direct responses to:]
7 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68443
8 >
9 > Affected Platform: AMD64.
10 > Affected Requirement: FEATURES=sandbox
11
12 Response posted to bug as requested. Slight ambiguity in instructions.
13 Will look there for answer.
14
15 (Additionally cross-posted to the amd64 group/list as a heads-up, as that
16 appears to have been missed originally.)
17
18 --
19 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
20 "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
21 temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --
22 Benjamin Franklin
23
24
25
26 --
27 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list