Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] amd64-fbsd profile marked 'stable'
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 14:08:36
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] amd64-fbsd profile marked 'stable' by Ulrich Mueller
On Tue, 8 May 2012 15:44:09 +0200
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:

> >>>>> On Tue, 8 May 2012, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > I've just marked the profile 'default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/9.0' as > > 'stable' in profiles.desc. I've been careful not to keyword > > anything with broken deps, and its now forbidden. It is the first > > g/fbsd profile marked as such. > > > [...] > > > cons: there's no stable amd64-fbsd keyword, i suppose that if we > > want some day to stabilize it, it'll be hard with a 'stable' > > profile, but we can temporarily switch it back to 'dev' while doing > > it, and without preventing broken deps it'll be almost impossible > > to do this anyway. > > This has as another consequence that we cannot extract the state of > keywords from profiles.desc any more. So we need to find a different > solution for bug 304133. > > Any ideas?
one of these maybe: 1) check if there's something starting with ~ in ACCEPT_KEYWORDS from make.default (probably slow); 2) generate that list from profile's make.default when building gentoolkit-dev 3) what are the usecases of ekeyword all ? noarch no deps packages ? in that case i dont really mind amd64-fbsd being included 4) make ekeyword all use the union of stable keywords of current package (probably saner as that wont bring in new stable keywords by mistake) 5) create a new profile state meaning 'no stable keyword but broken deps are errors' A.