| 1 |
I find it a little annoying, but not that annoying. I have a few |
| 2 |
checks to make on libsdl, since it did fail with my CFLAGS settings. |
| 3 |
Perhaps it's not -fvisibility-inlines-hidden. As for KDE apps, didn't |
| 4 |
someone mention earlier that these ebuilds now filter |
| 5 |
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden? This doesn't fix the problem with the |
| 6 |
flag, it just covers it up. In any case, it's a possible problem that |
| 7 |
I will put up with. btw, I'm not using visibility=hidden (dev-only |
| 8 |
flag, not for users). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
--James Potts |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
On 4/27/06, R Hill <dirtyepic.sk@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 14 |
> James Potts wrote: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> > -fvisibility-inlines-hidden not only breaks a number of kde apps afaik (it's |
| 17 |
> > filtered now), |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Again, probably -fvisibility=hidden. Many people have had success building KDE |
| 20 |
> with both flags enabled lately, so maybe that's something that could be |
| 21 |
> revisited when 4.1 goes ~arch. Getting off topic here, so see |
| 22 |
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-426814.html if you're interested. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> but it also seems to break SDL (using noflagstrip). |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> -fvisibility-inlines-hidden affects C++ code. libsdl is written in C. ;) |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> > It's not |
| 29 |
> > broken enough that I'm going to remove it from my global CXXFLAGS, tho, |
| 30 |
> > especially since if it breaks something I know about it right away (compile |
| 31 |
> > error) and can remove the flag for that package. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Right, so you don't find that `sleep 5` at the beginning of every single emerge |
| 34 |
> just a little annoying? ;) |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> --de. |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> -- |
| 39 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives