1 |
On 9/10/18 10:56 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
2 |
> On 9/10/18 10:51 PM, Matt Turner wrote: |
3 |
>> Consider again the bug that started this. The maintainer had not built |
4 |
>> this configuration. None of the arch teams had built this |
5 |
>> configuration until I did for the last architecture Cc'd. The patch |
6 |
>> committed doesn't change anything installed on the system, if not for |
7 |
>> Werror preventing the code from building. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> one way to look at it though, is that it is a valuable upstream |
10 |
> contribution that this configuration produces the error, so Gentoo is |
11 |
> contributing to upstream development because of it. |
12 |
> |
13 |
|
14 |
Adding to this, that arch testing for stabilization didn't catch this |
15 |
might say more about our stabilization procedures than the quality of |
16 |
the upstream package (that in this case routinely includes patches to |
17 |
fix these issues). And they are mostly cought in testing (~arch) |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
21 |
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
22 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |