From: | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | ||
Date: | Thu, 24 May 2012 10:03:42 | ||
Message-Id: | CAATnKFCTh5zR=MnQ7sh7K9f+TBitw4-Duccv80o7q=j2wtMLfA@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Alexey Shvetsov |
1 | On 24 May 2012 05:35, Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@g.o> wrote: |
2 | > Full clone will be about 1G or so but no more then 2. If we will drop |
3 | > changelog it will be much smaller |
4 | > |
5 | |
6 | And if you use git commit signing instead of ebuild manifests, |
7 | intra-commit churn will almost be negligible. :D |
8 | |
9 | |
10 | -- |
11 | Kent |
12 | |
13 | perl -e "print substr( \"edrgmaM SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_ * 3, |
14 | 3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );" |
15 | |
16 | http://kent-fredric.fox.geek.nz |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@g.o> |