| 1 |
On 08/09/2015 04:26 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:09 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I was wondering if we should set a standard for referencing bug reports. |
| 4 |
>> The portage team already does something like that: |
| 5 |
>> https://github.com/gentoo/portage/commit/b7149002bf23889f280c502afe6ceda0b1345ca3 |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Following that, the commit could have been: |
| 8 |
>> ===== |
| 9 |
>> sci-libs/opencascade: add USE=vtk |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> thanks to Helmut Jarausch |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022 |
| 14 |
>> X-Gentoo-Bug-url: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=557022 |
| 15 |
>> ===== |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I don't really see why it has to be so verbose. Can we just make it |
| 18 |
> "bug 557022", or even #557022? That would also make it fit better if |
| 19 |
> you have a single-line commit message only. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I think "X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022" also makes the job easier for tools that |
| 23 |
parse commit messages. |
Archives